9:00am-7:00pm EST | M-F
Asset & Creditor Protection for Self-Directed IRA LLC
Asset & Creditor Protection is Necessary
Asset & creditor protection for a Self-directed IRA LLC is a form of guarding your wealth. This is why it’s so valuable for your Self-Directed IRA. After all, retirement accounts are several of Americans’ most valuable assets. It’s important to protect your IRA funds from creditors, including people who have won lawsuits against you. Generally, the asset/creditor protection strategies available to you depend on the type of retirement account you own. Is your retirement account Traditional, IRA or 401(k) qualified plan? Each of these retirement accounts are subject to different Asset & Creditor Protection for Self-Directed IRA LLC strategies.IRA Protection From Creditors by State
The creditor protection for these plans depends on your state residency, and whether the assets are yours or if you inherited them. You will find the asset & creditor protection by state for a Self-Directed IRA below. You will find IRA protection for California, Florida, New York – all 50 states. IRA Asset Protection, also known as IRA Creditor Protection or IRA Bankruptcy Protection, can help protect the assets in your IRA from lawsuits, creditors, liens and more. It is a type of technique that protects your valuable assets. The best advice is to protect your assets prior to any claims or liabilities. Often, it’s too late to protect yourself when a claim occurs.
As you may know, when using a Self-Directed IRA LLC, you have the opportunity to make a wide range of investments: both traditional and non-traditional. However, it’s important to note that you also receive strong asset and creditor protection. So by using an LLC that your IRA completely owns (Self-Directed IRA), you gain another layer of limited liability protection. For example, if you use a Self-Directed IRA LLC to make investments, you have better asset and creditor protection vs making the investment yourself. Because of this, it’s wise to invest and grow your retirement funds in a self-directed IRA LLC. It will protect your retirement assets from creditors, inside or outside of bankruptcy.IRA’s Federal Protection for Bankruptcy
Similar to 401(k) qualified plans, there's The Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (“BAPCPA” or the “Act”). It became effective for bankruptcies that filed after October 17, 2005, and gave protection to debtor’s IRA funds. This was done by exempting IRA funds from the bankruptcy estate, in other words, by exempting most unsecured business and consumer debts. An unsecured debt is essentially a loan that is not backed by an underlying asset. The general exemption provides an unlimited exemption for IRAs under section 408 and Roth IRAs under section 408A.Traditional and Roth IRAs that a debtor creates and funds are subject to an exemption limitation of $1 million in full for all such IRAs. This is adjusted for inflation and can increase if the bankruptcy judge determines that the increase is justified.A rollover from an SEP or SIMPLE IRA into a rollover IRA receives only $1 million of protection. This is because section 408(d)(3) rollover is not one of the rollovers the Bankruptcy Code section 522(n) approves.Protection of IRAs from Creditors Outside of Bankruptcy
In general, ERISA pension plans, such as 401(k) qualified plans, are afforded extensive anti-alienation creditor protection. This means that pension plan benefits will not go to a creditor. And if the pension plan must pay creditors, it loses it’s good tax status. This is both inside and outside of bankruptcy. However, these extensive anti-alienation protections do not extend to an IRA. And this includes a Self-Directed IRA arrangement under Code section 408. Therefore, since an individually established and funded Traditional or Roth IRA is not an ERISA pension plan, IRAs are not preempted under ERISA. Thus, for anything short of bankruptcy, state law determines whether IRAs (including Roth IRAs) will receive protection from creditors’ claims.It’s important to note, on June 12, 2014, the Supreme Court unanimously upheld a Seventh Circuit decision that said inherited IRAs do not enjoy the protections of IRAs in bankruptcy proceedings.Summary: State Protections that IRAs Receive
The following table will provide a summary of state protection that IRAs receive, including Self-Directed IRAs, from creditors outside of the bankruptcy context.| State | State Statute | Special Statutory Provision | State Traditional IRA Exemption from Creditors | State Roth IRA Exemption from Creditors |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | Ala. Code ¤19-3B-508 | Yes | No | |
| Alaska | Alaska Stat. ¤09.38.017 | In fact, the exemption does not apply to amounts within 120 days before the debtor files for bankruptcy. | Yes | Yes |
| Arizona | Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. ¤ 33-1126C | In fact, the exemption does not apply to amounts within 120 days before a debtor files for bankruptcy. | Yes | Yes |
| Arkansas | Ark. Code Ann. ¤16-66-220 | Yes | Yes | |
| California | Cal. Civ. Proc. Code ¤ 704.115 | Yes* | No | |
| Colorado | Colo. Rev. Stat. ¤13-54-102 | Yes | Yes | |
| Connecticut | Conn. Gen. Stat. ¤52-321a | Yes | Yes | |
| Delaware | Del Code Ann. ¤ 10-4915 | Yes | Yes | |
| D.C. | D.C. Code ¤ 15-501(a)(9) & (10) | Yes | Yes | |
| Florida | Fla. Stat. Ann. ¤222.21 | In this case, the debtorÕs IRAs are exempt from creditors, however one Florida court has held that inherited IRAs are not exempt from creditors (Robertson v. Deeb, 16 So. 3d 936 (Fla. 2d Aug. 14, 2009). | Yes | Yes |
| Georgia | Georgia Code Ann. ¤ 44-13-100(a)(2.1) | In this case, IRAs are exempt only to the extent necessary for the support of the debtor and any dependent. | Yes | No |
| Hawaii | Hawaii Rev. Stat. ¤ 651-124 | However, this exemption does not apply to contributions toward a plan or arrangement within three years before the date a civil action begins against the debtor. | Yes | No |
| Idaho | Idaho Code ¤¤ 11-604A, 55-1011 | Yes | No | |
| Illinois | I.L.C.S. ¤ 5/12-1006 | Yes | Yes | |
| Indiana | Ind. Code Ann. ¤ 55-10-2(c)(6) | Yes | No | |
| Iowa | Iowa Code Ann. ¤ 627.6(8)(e), (f) | Yes | Yes | |
| Kansas | Kan. Stat. Ann. ¤ 60-2308 | Yes | Yes | |
| Kentucky | Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. ¤ 427.150(2)(f) | However, this exemption does not apply to any amounts contributed to an individual retirement account if the contribution occurs within 120 days before the debtor files for bankruptcy. Also the exemption does not apply to the right or interest of a person in individual retirement account to the extent that right or interest is subject to a court order for payment of maintenance or child support. | Yes | Yes |
| Louisiana | La. Rev. Stat. Ann. ¤¤ 20:33(1), 13:3881(D) | Here. itÕs important to realize no contribution to an IRA is exempt less than one calendar year from the date of filing bankruptcy. This is whether voluntary or involuntary, or the date rights of seizure are filed against the account. Also the exemption does not apply to liabilities for alimony and child support. | Yes | Yes |
| Maine | Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. Tit. 14, ¤ 4422(13)(E) | Exempt only to the extent reasonably necessary for the support of the debtor and any dependent. | Yes | Yes |
| Maryland | Md. Code Ann. Cts. & Jud. Proc. ¤ 11-504(h)(1) | Yes | Yes | |
| Massachusetts | Mass. Gen. L. Ch. 235 ¤ 34A; 236 ¤ 28 | The exemption does not apply to an order of court concerning divorce, separate maintenance or child support. Additionally, not to an order of court requiring an individual convicted of a crime to satisfy a monetary penalty or to make restitution. Furthermore, it doesnÕt apply to sums deposited in a plan in excess of 7% of the total income of the individual within 5 years of the individualÕs declaration of bankruptcy or entry of judgment. | Yes | Yes |
| Michigan | Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. ¤¤ 600.5451(1), 600.6023(1)(k) | The exemption does not apply to amounts an individual contributes to a retirement account or individual retirement annuity. Of course, this is if the contribution occurs within 120 days before the debtor files for bankruptcy. Also the exemption does not apply to an order of the domestic relations court. | Yes | Yes |
| Minnesota | Minn. Rev. Stat. Ann. ¤ 550.37(24) | Protection limited to $60,000 (adjusts for inflation). | Yes | Yes |
| Mississippi | Miss. Code Ann. ¤ 85-3-1(e)Applies to solo 401k plans | Yes | Yes | |
| Missouri | Mo. Ann. Stat. ¤ 513.430.1(10)(e) and (f) | Exemption limited to extent reasonably necessary for support. | Yes | Yes |
| Montana | Mont. Code Ann. ¤¤ 19-2-1004, 25-13-608, 31-2-106 | Yes | Yes | |
| Nebraska | Neb. Rev. Stat. ¤ 25-1563.01 | For IRAs Ð Bound to the extent reasonably necessary for support. Individual Retirement Accounts generally receive protection from attachment and garnishment to the extent the funds contained therein are reasonably necessary for the support of the debtor or any dependent of the debtor. Novak v. Novak, 245 Neb. 366, 513 N.W.2d 303 (1994). | Yes | Yes |
| Nevada | Nev. Rev. Stat. ¤ 21.090(1)(q) | The exemption is limited to $500,000 in present value held in an IRA. | Yes | Yes |
| New Hampshire | N.H. Code Ann. ¤ 511:2, XIX | Yes | Yes | |
| New Jersey | N.J. Stat. Ann. ¤ 25:2-1(b) | Yes | Yes | |
| New Mexico | N.M. Stat. Ann. ¤¤ 42-10-1, 42-10-2 | Yes | Yes | |
| New York | N.Y. Civ. Prac. L. and R. ¤ 5205(c) | Yes | Yes | |
| North Carolina | N.C. Gen. Stat. ¤ 1C-1601(a)(9) | Yes | Yes | |
| North Dakota | N.D. Cent. Code ¤ 28-22-03.1(3) | Retirement funds that are in effect for at least one year to the extent those funds are in an account that is exempt from taxation. This is under section 401, 403, 408, 408A, 414, 457, or 501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. So the value of those assets that are exempt may not exceed one hundred thousand dollars for any one account or two hundred thousand dollars in aggregate for all account. | Yes | Yes |
| Ohio | Ohio Rev. Code Ann. ¤ 2329.66(A)(10)(b) and (c) | SEP and SIMPLE IRAs are not protected. | Yes | Yes |
| Oklahoma | 31 Okla. St. Ann. ¤ 1(A)(20) | Yes | Yes | |
| Oregon | 42 Pa. C.S. ¤¤ 8124(b)(1)(vii), (viii), (ix) | Yes | Yes | |
| Pennsylvania | 42 Pa. C.S. ¤¤ 8124(b)(1)(vii), (viii), (ix) | 100%, except for amounts that are, first, contributed within 1 year (not including rollovers). Second, contributed in excess of $15,000 in a one-year period. Or, third, deemed fraudulent conveyances. | Yes | Yes |
| Rhode Island | R.I. Gen. Laws ¤ 9-26-4(11), (12) | Yes | Yes | |
| South Carolina | S.C. Code Ann. ¤ 15-41-30(12) | IRA exemption limited to the extent reasonably necessary for support. For Solo 401(k) Plans, not limited to the extent reasonable necessary for support. | Yes | Yes |
| South Dakota | S.D. Cod. Laws ¤¤ 43-45-16S.D. Cod. Laws ¤¤ 43-45- 17 | Exempts Òcertain retirement benefitsÓ up to $1,000,000. | Yes | Yes |
| Tennessee | Tenn. Code Ann. ¤ 26-2-105 | Distributions 100% exempt to the extent they are on account of age, death, or length of service and debtor has no right or option to receive other than periodic payments at or after age 58. | Yes | Yes |
| Texas | Tex. Prop. Code ¤ 42.0021 | Yes | Yes | |
| Utah | Utah Code Ann. ¤ 78-23-5(1)(a)(xiv) | The exemption does not apply to amounts contributed or benefits accrued by or on behalf of a debtor within one year before the debtor files for bankruptcy. | Yes | Yes |
| Vermont | 12 Vt. Stat. Ann. ¤ 2740(16) | Yes | Yes | |
| Virginia | Va. Code Ann. ¤ 34-34 | Limited to interest in one or more plans sufficient to produce annual benefit of up to $25,000 (pursuant to actuarial table in statute). | Yes | Yes |
| Washington | Wash. Rev. Code ¤ 6.15.020 | Yes | Yes | |
| West Virginia | W. Va. Code ¤ 38-10-4(j)(5) | Principal 100% protected. Exemption for distributions limited to the extent reasonably necessary for support. | Yes | No |
| Wisconsin | Wisc. Stat. Ann. ¤ 815.18(3) | Yes | Yes | |
| Wyoming | Wy. Stat. Ann ¤ 1-20-110(a)(i), (ii). No statutory exemption for IRAs. Ð only mentions retirement plans | No statutory exemption for IRAs. Ð only mentions retirement plans | No | No |
Get a Free Consultation